Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier ETF LQ-45
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Premier ETF LQ-45 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The prod was removed. This is non-notable. SL93 (talk) 14:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The information in this very short article is already contained in the Indo Premier Investment Management article and does not deserve an article of its own based on lack of notability. Ochiwar (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: DGG seconded my prod and said that this would not be an appropriate redirect. SL93 (talk) 19:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 06:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per SL93 and Ochiwar - there just doesn't seem to be a need for a separate article to cover this until it has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources in its own right. Stalwart111 12:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.